Daybreak Crown landing page previews

Internal review. One product, three pages, two audiences plus an aggressive A/B variant. Working name and $1,199 price are placeholders pending your decision.

These are design and copy previews, not live pages. Images are placeholders. The Buy buttons are not wired (the Shopify SKU does not exist yet), so clicking Buy will not check out. Review copy, structure, and claims here, then decide in 00_ROB_DECISIONS.md.

A · Conviction

Faith / partner page

For Amanda, Gruber, His Glory, Flashpoint, Meri, broadcast. Honesty and stewardship. Story first, then the offer.

Open →

Compliance risk: low

B · Mainstream

Secular / EOFire page

EOFire, organic search, softest Meta lane. Mechanism-led with a price anchor. No faith or 5G content.

Open →

Compliance risk: low

C · Aggressive

Cold-traffic / advertorial

The competitor register. The onslaught, the "what if" stack, longevity and high performance, the $3,395-vs-$1,199 flip. Built to your brief.

Open →

Compliance risk: elevated (net-impression). See NOTES.md.

The A/B question this is set up to answer: restrained honest (B) vs aggressive advertorial (C) on cold non-Meta traffic. Same product, price, and guarantee, so copy register is the only variable. Note: C will NOT run as cold paid Meta traffic (Meta health/scare policy). Its lanes are native/advertorial, email, YouTube, and partner-adjacent cold.

What to decide from these:

Final name (Daybreak Crown vs Selah Crown vs Photon Crown)
Final price and whether it is one tier or two
Which cold page leads, and whether to run the aggressive C at all (claims sign-off + ideally a legal read before real spend)
Whether Rob's morning-ritual line on the conviction page is true to fact
Real product photos and testimonials to replace the placeholders

Verdict, name, price, decision table, runbook, and QA are in 00_ROB_DECISIONS.md. The aggressive variant's posture and risk are in 10_LP_Cold_Aggressive/NOTES.md. Rak Chazak.